°í°´¼¾ÅÍ

Á¶È¸¼ö 3655
Á¦¸ñ Èæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦ È¿°ú
µî·ÏÀÏ 2013-08-23
ÓÞùÛÜâõ®ùÊüåò¼ Á¦26±Ç Á¦3È£(2011³â 9¿ù)
Kor. J. Herbology 2011£»26(3)£º83-90
Èæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦È°¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸
¼Û±Ô¿ë1, Á¤±ÔÁø1, ½Å¿µÁø1, ÀÌ°è¿ø2, À̼÷¿µ3, ¼­¿µ¹è4*
1£ºÃæ³²´ëÇб³ ¾àÇдëÇÐ ¾àÇаú
2£º°Ç¾ç´ëÇб³ Á¦¾à°øÇаú
3£º¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ÇÑÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ÇѾàÀÚ¿ø°³¹ßÇаú
4£º´ëÀü´ëÇб³ ÇÑÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÇÑÀÇÇаú
Study on Antiangiogenic Effect of Black Ginseng Radix
Gyu Yong Song1, Kyu Jin Chung1, Young Jin Shin1, Gye Won Lee2,
Sook-Young Lee3, Young-Bae Seo4*
1£ºCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, Korea
2£ºDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Konyang University, Nonsan 320-711, Korea
3£ºDepartment of Herbal Resources, Professional Graduate School of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University,
Iksan 570-749, Korea
4£ºDepartment of Herbalogy, College of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea
ABSTRACT
Objectives£ºThis study was performed to investigate the influence of black ginseng radix extracts (BG) and
ginsenoside Rg3, Rg5 on basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) induced proliferation, migration and capillary
tubule-like formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).
Methods£ºHUVECs were cultured with BG and ginsenoside Rg3, Rg5 at different concentrations (60, 125, 250,
500, 1,000 §¶/§¢) for 2 day in the presence of bFGF, respectively. XTT was used to detect the proliferation.
Migration and tube formations were examined to detect the antiangiogenesis. Also, the chick embryo
chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay was performed to detect the antiangiogenesis.
Results£ºBG and ginsenoside Rg3, Rg5 significantly inhibited bFGF-induced endothelial cell proliferation and
migration in a dose-dependent manner. Tube formation in bFGF-induced HUVECs were suppressed by BG and
ginsenoside Rg3, Rg5. Moreover, BG and ginsenoside Rg3, Rg5 (30-50 §¶/egg) inhibited new blood vessel
formation on the growing CAM.
Conclusions£ºBased on the present results, it can be suggested that BG has a potential chemopreventive agent
via antiangiogenesis.
Key words£ºBlack ginsneng, antiangiogesesis, ginsenoside Rg3, Rg5, CAM
¼­ ·Ð
°í·ÁÀλï(Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer)Àº µÎ¸¨³ª¹«°ú
(Araliaceae)¿¡ ¼ÓÇÏ´Â ½Ä¹°·Î½á ¾î¿øÀ» º¸¸é ¡®Pan¡¯Àº ¸ð
µç °Í, ¡®Axos¡¯´Â ÀÇÇÐÀ̶ó´Â ¶æÀ¸·Î ¸¸º´ÅëÄ¡¶ó´Â Àǹ̸¦
¶æÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °í·ÁÀλïÀº ¼öõ³â µ¿¾È °í±ÍÇÑ »ý¾àÁ¦·Î »ç
¿ëµÇ¾î ¿ÔÀ¸¸ç ¿ª»çÀûÀ¸·Î ¹®È­ÀûÀ¸·Î ±×¸®°í »ê¾÷ÀûÀ¸·Î ¸Å¿ì
Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ì¸®¹ÎÁ·ÀÇ À¯»êÀÌÀÚ ÀÚ¿øÀÌ´Ù1)
. ƯÈ÷ °í·ÁÀλïÀº Ÿ
±¹ÀÇ Àλﺸ´Ù Ź¿ùÇÑ È¿´ÉÀ» ³ªÅ¸³½´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ¾î °¢±¹ÀÇ
¼ÒºñÀڵ鿡°Ô ¸¹Àº »ç¶ûÀ» ¹Þ¾Æ¿Ô´Ù. Well-Being ½Ã´ë¸¦ ¸Â
ÀÌÇÏ¿© Çö´ëÀεéÀÇ Ãµ¿¬¹°À» ¼±È£ÇÏ´Â Ãß¼¼¿Í °í·ÁÀλïÀÇ ´Ù
¾çÇÑ È¿´ÉÀÌ ½ÇÇè½ÇÀû °á°ú»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÀÓ»óÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î Á¡Â÷Àû
À¸·Î ÀÔÁõµÇ¾î °í·ÁÀλïÀº ¼¼°èÀûÀÎ ÀÚ¿¬°Ç°­½ÄÇ°À¸·Î °¢±¤À»
¹Þ°Ô µÇ¾ú°í ÇÑ¹æ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Çö´ëÀÇÇп¡¼­µµ ÀǾàÇ°À̳ª °Ç°­
*±³½ÅÀúÀÚ£º¼­¿µ¹è. ´ëÀü´ëÇб³ ÇÑÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ º»ÃÊÇб³½Ç. ․ Tel£º+82-42-280-2625. ․ E-mail£ºgenin@dju.ac.kr. ․ Á¢¼ö£º2011³â 8¿ù 15ÀÏ ․ ¼öÁ¤£º2011³â 9¿ù 7ÀÏ ․ äÅãº2011³â 9¿ù 17ÀÏ
84 ÓÞ ùÛ Üâ õ®ùÊüåò¼¡ª Vol. 26, No. 3, 2011
±â´É¼º½ÄÇ°À¸·Î ±× ¼ö¿ä°¡ Á¡Á¡ Áõ°¡µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ´Ù¾ç
ÇÑ ÇüÅ·Π°¡°øÀλïÁ¦Ç°ÀÌ °³¹ßµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±¹³»ÀÇ °æ¿ì ±â
´É¼º ÀλïÀÇ ´ëÇ¥ Á¦Ç°Àº Áö³­ 98³â ¹ÙÀÌ¿Àº¥Ã³±â¾÷ Áø»ý»ç
À̾𽺰¡ °³¹ßÇÑ ¡®¼±»ï¡¯À¸·Î½á Áö³­ 2001³â ¼±»ïÁ¤À¸·Î °³
¹ßµÅ ±¹³» °Ç°­±â´É¼º½ÄÇ° ½ÃÀå¿¡ º»°Ý ¾Ë·ÁÁø ÀÌÈÄ ±¹³»´Â
¹°·Ð Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀÎ ¹ß¸íÇ°À¸·Îµµ ÀÎÁ¤¹ÞÀ¸¸ç ±â´É¼º ÀλïÀÇ ¼±
µÎÁÖÀÚ·Î ÀÚ¸®¸Å±èÇÑ »óÅÂÀÌ´Ù2). ¶ÇÇÑ ¡®È²»ïEX¡¯, ¡®ÆØÈ­È«
»ï¡¯, ¡®¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸Æ½º¡¯, ¡®½Ä½ºÇ÷¯½º¡¯, ¡®È²»ï¡¯ µî°ú °°Àº
¿©·¯ Á¾·ùÀÇ °¡°øÀλïÀÌ °³¹ßµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ ÇÁ¸®¹Ì¾ö
ÀÎ»ï ½Ã´ë¸¦ ¸ÂÀÌÇÏ¿© º» ¿¬±¸ÆÀÀº Áõ¼÷¹ýÀÇ ÇϳªÀÎ ÇѾàÀçÀÇ
°¡°ø¹æ¹ý Áß ¹°°ú ºÒÀ» ÇÔ²² »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ´ëÇ¥ÀûÀÎ
¹æ¹ýÀÎ ±¸Áõ±¸Æ÷(ÎúñúÎúøí)ÀÇ ¿ø¸®¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î °¡°øÀλï
ÀÎ Èæ»ïÀ» °³¹ßÇÑ ¹Ù ÀÖ´Ù3). Áï, ÀλïÀ» 9¹ø Âî°í ¸»¸®´Â °ú
Á¤À» ¹Ýº¹ÇÏ¿© Èæ»ïÀ» Á¦Á¶ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Èæ»ïÀº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹é»ïÀ̳ª
È«»ï¿¡ ºñÇؼ­ ¿ùµîÈ÷ Ç×¾Ï È¿°ú ¹× ºñ¸¸¾ïÁ¦È¿°ú°¡ ¿ì¼öÇÏ´Ù
´Â »ç½ÇÀ» ¹àÈù ¹Ù ÀÖ´Ù4). ¶ÇÇÑ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ±¸Áõ±¸Æ÷ÀÇ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñ
Çؼ­ Á¦Á¶´Ü°è¸¦ ȹ±âÀûÀ¸·Î °³¼±ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¼Ò·®ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ´ë·®
À¸·Î Ç°ÁúÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÑ Ç¥ÁØÈ­µÈ Èæ»ïÀÇ Á¦Á¶¹æ¹ýÀ» °³¹ßÇÏ¿© º¸
°íÇÑ ¹Ù ÀÖ´Ù5).
½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼ºÀ̶õ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Ç÷°üÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ »õ·Î¿î Ç÷°üÀÌ Çü¼º
µÇ´Â ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ °úÁ¤À¸·Î Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀÇ ¾ïÁ¦Á¦ (thrombospondin
-1, angiostatin, endostatin etc.)¿Í È°¼ºÈ­Á¦ (VEGF,
bFGF, EGF etc.)ÀÇ ±ÕÇü¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Á¶ÀýµÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î, ¹è¾Æ¹ß
´Þ, »ý½Ä, »óóġÀ¯ µîÀÇ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ³ªÅ¸³­´Ù6,7). ¾ÏÁ¶Á÷Àº ÀÚ
½ÅµéÀÇ »ýÁ¸À» À§ÇØ ¹Ýµå½Ã ½Å»ý Ç÷°üÇü¼º (angiogenesis)ÀÌ
ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, ÀÌ Ç÷°üÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ »ê¼Ò¿Í ¿µ¾çºÐÀ» °ø±Þ¹ÞÁö¸¸, Ç÷
°üÇü¼º ¾øÀÌ ¾ÏÁ¶Á÷Àº 1-2 mmÀÌ»ó ¼ºÀåÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù7-10). Ç÷
°üÀº ¾Ï¼¼Æ÷°¡ ´Ù¸¥ ºÎÀ§³ª Àå±â·Î È®»êµÇ´Â °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ÀÇ Åë·Î
·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾ÏÄ¡·á ½ÇÆÐ ¹× ¾Ï ȯÀÚ »ç¸Á¿øÀÎÀÌ µÈ´Ù11). Áï
¾ÏÁ¶Á÷ÀÇ ÀüÀÌ¿Í ¼ºÀåÀº Ç÷°ü¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ïÁö±â ¶§¹®¿¡
Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀ» ÀúÇØÇÔÀ¸·Î½á À̸¦ Â÷´ÜÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î Ç÷°üÇü¼º
ÀúÇØÁ¦´Â ÁÁÀº Ç×¾ÏÁ¦°¡ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º ÀúÇØ
Á¦´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Ç×¾ÏÁ¦°¡ ¾Ï¼¼Æ÷¸¦ Ç¥ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â ¹Ý¸é ³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷
¸¦ Ç¥ÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¸ç ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Ç×¾ÏÁ¦º¸´Ù µ¶¼ºÀÌ ¾àÇÏ°í ³»¼ºÀÌ
³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¹Ç·Î ºÎÀÛ¿ëÀÌ ÀûÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù. ½ÇÁ¦·Î
½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º ÀúÇØ ÀÛ¿ëÀ» ÅëÇØ ¾Ï¼¼Æ÷ Áõ½ÄÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ´Â
angiostatin°ú endostatinÀÌ °³¹ßµÇ¾î °¢±¤À» ¹Þ¾ÒÀ¸¸ç12),
ÀÌ¿Ü¿¡µµ Æú¸®ÆéŸÀÌµå ·ù, Ç×»ýÁ¦·ù, ½ºÅ×·ÎÀ̵å·ù, Æú¸®¾ç
ÀÌ¿Â ¹× Æú¸®À½À̿·ù, ¾Ï¾ïÁ¦À¯ÀüÀÚ·ù, Æú¸®»çÄ«¶óÀ̵å·ù µî
¿©·¯ °¡Áö ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦Á¦°¡ °³¹ßµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Á¾¾çÀÇ Àü
ÀÌ´Â ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀÇ ´ëÇ¥Àû Ư¼ºÀ¸·Î ¾ÏȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô °¡Àå ÈçÇÑ »ç
¸Á¿øÀÎÀÌ¸ç ¶Ç ¾Ï Ä¡·á¿¡µµ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀÌ´Ù. °íÇü
Á¾¾çÀÇ ¾à 80%¿¡¼­ ÀüÀÌ°¡ ÀϾ°í, ¾ÏÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ »ç¸ÁÀÇ ¾à
70%´Â Àç¹ß¾Ï¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ´Ù. ±×·±µ¥ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü»ý¼ºÀº Á¾¾çÀÇ ¼ºÀå
¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÏ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, Á¾¾çÀÇ ÀüÀÌ¿¡µµ ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÏ°Ô °ü·ÃµÇ
¾î ÀÖ´Ù. ±¹³»¿¡¼­µµ Ç÷°ü ½Å»ý ¾ïÁ¦¿Í °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© ½Ä¹° ÃßÃâ¹°
À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ½ÃÇàµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç13-15), °èÁö, ¹éÃâ,
¿øÁö, À°µÎ±¸, ÀÎÁø, ·ÎÁ¸®, ·¹¸ó¹ãµîÀÇ 7Á¾ÀÇ ÇѾ๰¿¡¼­
Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ´Â È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Ù°í º¸°íµÇ¾ú°í16), ¿ï±Ý µî
¸î¸îÀÇ ÇѾàÀç¿¡¼­´Â Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀ» È°¼ºÈ­ÇÏ´Â È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Ù°í
º¸°íµÇ¾ú´Ù17,18).
Èæ»ïÀº ÀÌ¹Ì Ç×¾ÏÈ°¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖÁö¸¸ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ
Ç×¾ÏÈ°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»´Â ÀÛ¿ë±âÀü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ¹ÌºñÇÑ ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ
´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÌ·± Èæ»ïÀÇ Ç÷°ü½Å»ý ¾ïÁ¦È¿°ú¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇϱâ
À§ÇÏ¿©, Ç÷°ü ³»ÇÇ ¼¼Æ÷ÀÎ human umbilical vein
endothelial cells (HUVEC)¿¡ Èæ»ï ¹× Èæ»ïÀÇ ÁÖ ¼ººÐÀÎ ÀÎ
»ï»çÆ÷´Ñ Rg3¿Í Rg5À» óġÇÏ¿© proliferation assay¿Í
migration assay, tube formation assay¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´°í, in
vivo ½ÇÇèÀ¸·Î Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM)
À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ assay¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© À¯ÀÇÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú±â¿¡ º¸°íÇÏ
´Â ¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.
Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý
1. Àç·á
½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÑ ½Ã¾à ¹× ±â±â´Â Gelatin (JUNSEI,
Japan), PBS (GIBCO, USA), 96 well plate (SPL,
KOREA), BSA (ameresco, USA), bFGF (Sigma, USA),
heparin (Cambrex, USA), FBS (GIBCO, USA), XTT
(Sigma, USA), ¼öÁ¤¶õ (Ç®¹«¿ø), Intralipid 10%
(Freseninus Kabi AB, Sweden), PMS (Phenazine
methosulfate, Sigma, USA), EGM media (Cambrex,
USA), EGM-2 singlequots (Cambrex, USA), Elisa
reader (Mediators PhL, Diagnostics systems, USA),
Polycarbonate membranes (8-¥ìm pore, Neuro Probe,
USA), boyden chamber (Neuro Probe, USA), Diff Quik
solution (Sysmex, Japan), matrigel (BD Biosciences,
USA), ÀÎÅ¥º£ÀÌÅÍ(SANYO, Japan), thermanox coverslip
(Nunc, USA), Image Gange V. 2.54 (Fuji, Japan),
OriginPro 6.1 (OriginLab Corporation, USA),
microplate reader (Molecular Devices Co. USA) µîÀ» »ç
¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÑ Èæ»ïÀº Ãæ³² ±Ý»êÁö¿ª¿¡¼­ Àç¹èÇÑ 10
¿ù°æ¿¡ ¼öÈ®ÇÑ ÀλïÀ» ±¸ÀÔÇÏ¿© ¼¼Ã´±â·Î ¼¼Ã´ÇÑ ÈÄ º» ¿¬±¸
ÀÚ°¡ º¸°íÇÑ ¹æ¹ý5)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¦Á¶ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Èæ»ïÀÇ ÁÖ Àλï
»çÆ÷´ÑÀÎ Rg3¿Í Rg5´Â ÀÌ¹Ì º¸°íÇÑ ¹æ¹ý19)¿¡ ÁØÇÏ¿© ºÐ¸®ÇÏ
¿© »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. ¼¼Æ÷¹è¾ç
Ç÷°ü ³»ÇÇ ¼¼Æ÷ÀÎ HUVECsÀº »ï¼º »êºÎÀΰú¿¡¼­ °ø±Þ¹Þ¾Æ
Jaffe ¹æ¹ý20)À¸·Î primary cultureÇÑ °ÍÀ» 0.1% gelatineÀÌ
coatingµÈ plate¿¡¼­ 3 ng/§¢ bFGF, 5 unit/§¢ heparin,
20% FBS°¡ ÷°¡µÈ M199¹èÁö¿¡¼­ 5% CO2, 37¡ÉÁ¶°ÇÀ¸·Î
¹è¾çÇÏ¿´´Ù.
3. Cytotoxicity assay
¼¼Æ÷ÁÖ¸¦ 0.1% gelatinÀÌ ÄÚÆÃµÈ 96-well Ç÷¹ÀÌÆ®¿¡
1¡¿104 À¸·Î ±ò°í 24½Ã°£ ÈÄ ½Ã·á¸¦ ó¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 24½Ã°£ ´õ
¹è¾ç ÈÄ PMS (sigma P-9625, 1.53 §·/§¢) 10 §¡¿Í XTT
(sigma X-4251, 1 §·/§¢) 1 §¢À» È¥ÇÕÇÏ¿© well´ç 50 §¡
¸¦ ÷°¡ÇÑ ÈÄ 2½Ã°£ ÈÄ¿¡ microplate reader 450 nm¿¡¼­
Èí±¤µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ »ýÁ¸ºñ¸¦ °è
Èæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦È°¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸ 85
»êÇÏ¿´´Ù.
4. HUVECs proliferation
Proliferation assay´Â XTT ¹æ¹ý21) À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´
´Ù. »ç¶÷ÀÇ Á¦´ë·ÎºÎÅÍ ºÐ¸®ÇÑ Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷ (HUVECs)¸¦
0.1% gelatinÀÌ ÄÚÆÃµÈ 96-well Ç÷¹ÀÌÆ®¿¡ 5¡¿103À¸·Î ºÐ
ÁÖÇÏ¿© 24½Ã°£ ¹è¾ç½ÃŲ ÈÄ 5% FBS¸¸ ÷°¡µÈ M199¹èÁö·Î
6½Ã°£ µ¿¾È starvation ½ÃÄ×´Ù. 5% FBS, 10 ng/§¢ bFGF¿Í
5 units/§¢ heparinÀÌ Ã·°¡µÈ M199¹èÁö·Î ½Ã·á¸¦ ³óµµº°·Î
Èñ¼®ÇÏ¿© 100 §¡¾¿ ÷°¡ÇÏ¿© 48½Ã°£ µ¿¾È ¹è¾ç½ÃÄ×´Ù. PMS
(sigma P-9625, 1.53 §·/§¢) 10 §¡¿Í XTT (1 §·/§¢) 1
§¢À» È¥ÇÕÇÏ¿© well´ç 50 §¡¸¦ ÷°¡ÇÑ ÈÄ 2½Ã°£ ÈÄ¿¡
microplate reader 450 nm¿¡¼­ Èí±¤µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ëÁ¶
±ºÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ »ýÁ¸ºñ¸¦ °è»êÇÏ¿´´Ù.
5. HUVECs migration assay22)
0.1% gelatinÀÌ ÄÚÆÃµÈ 6-well Ç÷¹ÀÌÆ®¿¡ HUVECs¸¦
3¡¿105À¸·Î seeding ÇÑ µÚ 24½Ã°£ ÈÄ¿¡ 200 §¡ tipÀ¸·Î ½º
Å©·¡Ä¡ ÇÑ ÈÄ PBS·Î ¼¼Ã´ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 5% FBS, 10 ng/§¢ bFGF
¿Í 5 units/§¢ heparinÀÌ Ã·°¡µÈ M199¹èÁö·Î ½Ã·á¸¦ ³óµµ
º°·Î ó¸®ÇÑ ÈÄ 15½Ã°£ ¹è¾çÇÏ¿´´Ù. PBS·Î ¼¼Ã´ ÈÄ
Diff-Quick fixative·Î ¼¼Æ÷¸¦ °íÁ¤½ÃÅ°°í Diff-Quick Sol.
À¸·Î ¼¼Æ÷¸¦ ¿°»öÇÑ ÈÄ Axiovert S 100 light microscope
(Carl Zeiss, Inc., USA)¿¡¼­ 50¹èÀ²·Î »çÁøÀ» Âï¾î À̵¿µÈ
¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ ¼ö¸¦ »êÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù.
6. HUVECs differentiation (Tube formation)
assay
Differentiation assay´Â GrantµîÀÇ ¹æ¹ý23 À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿©
tube°¡ Çü¼ºµÇ´Â °ÍÀ» °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. Growth factor reduced
matrigel 200 §¡¸¦ 24-well Ç÷¹ÀÌÆ®¿¡ ºÐÁÖÇÏ¿© 37¡É¿¡¼­
30ºÐ°£ ÄÚÆÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. 5% FBS, 10 ng/§¢ bFGF¿Í 5 units/
§¢ heparinÀÌ Ã·°¡µÈ M199¹èÁö·Î ½Ã·á¿Í Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷
4¡¿104À» È¥ÇÕÇÏ¿© 500 §¡¾¿ ºÐÁÖÇÏ¿´´Ù. À½¼º´ëÁ¶±º¿¡´Â
bFGF¸¦ ó¸®ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù. 9½Ã°£µ¿¾È ¹è¾ç ÈÄ Diff-Quick
fixative·Î ¼¼Æ÷¸¦ °íÁ¤½ÃÅ°°í Diff-Quick Sol.À¸·Î ¼¼Æ÷¸¦
¿°»öÇÑ ÈÄ Axiovert S 100 light microscope (Carl Zeiss,
Inc., USA)¿¡¼­ 50¹èÀ²·Î »çÁøÀ» Âï¾î Çü¼ºµÈ Ç÷°üÀ» °üÂûÇÏ
¿´´Ù.
7. Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane(CAM)
Assay
1ÀÏ° (0ÀϹè) : ¼öÁ¤¶õÀ» ¹è¾ç±â¿¡¼­ ºÎÈ­½ÃÄ×´Ù. À̶§,
¹è¾ç±âÀÇ ¿Âµµ´Â 37-38¡É·Î, ½Àµµ´Â 90% ÀÌ»ó À¯ÁöµÇµµ·Ï
¼ö½Ã·Î È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿©±â¿¡¼­ 0ÀÏ ¹è¶õ ¼öÁ¤¶õÀÌ »ê¶õµÇ¾î
18¡É¿¡¼­ º¸°üµÈ Áö 3-4ÀÏ À̳»ÀÇ °ÍÀ» ¸»ÇÑ´Ù.
3ÀÏ° (2ÀϹè) : ¼öÁ¤¶õÀÇ »ÏÂÊÇÑ ³¡ºÎºÐ¿¡ Ä®·Î ÈìÀ» ³¿.
ÀÌÈÄ, ¼öÆòÀ¸·Î ´µ¾î³õ°í 5 §¢ ÁÖ»ç±â·Î ±¸¸ÛÀ» ³½ ´ÙÀ½ ¾Ë
ºÎ¹ÎÀ» 2 §¢ Á¤µµ »Ì¾Æ³»¾ú´Ù. ¼öÁ¤¶õÀÌ °ÇÁ¶µÇÁö ¾Ê°í ¶Ç
°¨¿°µÇÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï ±¸¸ÛÀ» À¯¸®Å×ÀÙÀ¸·Î ºÀÇÑ ÈÄ ±¸¸ÛÀÌ ¾Æ·¡·Î
ÇâÇϵµ·Ï ³õ°í ´Ù½Ã ¹è¾ç½ÃÄ×´Ù.
4ÀÏ° (3ÀϹè) : ¼öÁ¤¶õÀÇ air sacÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ÂÊ(ÁÖ»ç±â ±¸¸Û
ÀÇ ¹Ý´ëÂÊ)À¸·Î Á÷°æ 2-3 §¯ Å©±âÀÇ ¿øÇü window¸¦ ³»°í
¼öÁ¤¶õÀ¸·Î È®ÀÎµÈ °Í¸¸ ³ÐÀº À¯¸®Å×ÀÙÀ¸·Î ¸·°í ´Ù½Ã ¹è¾ç½Ã
Ä×´Ù. Âü°í·Î, ¿øÇü window¸¦ ³»´Â ¹æ¹ýÀº ³¯Ä«·Î¿î Ä®·Î ¼ö
Á¤¶õÀÇ ²®Áú À§¿¡ ¿øÇüÀ¸·Î ÈìÀ» ³½ µÚ ÇɼÂÀ¸·Î ²®ÁúÀ» ¶â¾î
³»¾ú´Ù. À̶§ ²®Áú°¡·ç°¡ ¾ÈÂÊÀ¸·Î ¶³¾îÁöÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï ÁÖÀÇÇÔ.
¼öÁ¤¶õÀ̶õ window¸¦ ³ÂÀ» ¶§ ½ÊÀÚ°¡ÇüÀÇ °¡´Â Ç÷°üÀÌ º¸ÀÌ
´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù.
5ÀÏ° (4.5ÀϹè) : ÀÌ ½Ã±â°¡ µÇ¸é CAMÀÌ »ý¼ºµÇ¸ç, ±×
Á÷°æÀÌ 2-5 §® Á¤µµ µÇ¾ú´Ù. ½Ã·á¸¦ ÀÌÂ÷ Áõ·ù¼ö¿¡ ³ìÀÎ ´Ù
À½ 4 µîºÐµÈ Thermanox coverslip À§¿¡ 10 §¡¾¿ ¶³¾î¶ß¸®
°í clean bench ¾È¿¡¼­ ¸»·È´Ù. ¿©±â¼­ Thermanox
coverslipÀº °¡À§·Î À߶ó 4µîºÐÇÏ¿© clean benchÀÇ UV ¾Æ·¡
¿¡¼­ overnight ½ÃŲ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¼öÁ¤¶õÀÇ À¯¸®Å×ÀÙÀ» Ä®·Î ¶â
¾î³»°í CAMÀ» ã¾Æ È®ÀÎÇÑ ÈÄ, ÇɼÂÀ¸·Î ½Ã·á°¡ 󸮵È
Thermanox¸¦ µÚÁý¾î Á¶½É½º·´°Ô ¿Ã·Á³õ°í ´Ù½Ã À¯¸®Å×ÀÙÀ¸
·Î ¸·¾Ò´Ù. À̶§ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °¡À§, Ä®, Çɼ µîÀº 70% ¿¡Åº¿Ã
·Î ¼Òµ¶ÇÏ¿© »ç¿ëÇÏ°í, ÇɼÂÀº ½Ã·á¸¦ ÇϳªÇϳª loadingÇÒ ¶§
¸¶´Ù ¼Òµ¶ÇÏ¿© »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ±âŸ ½ÇÇè±â±¸µéµµ ¼öÁ¤¶õÀÌ °¨
¿°µÇÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï ÁÖÀÇÇϸ鼭 »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù.
7ÀÏ° (6.5ÀϹè) : À¯¸®Å×ÀÙÀ» Ä®·Î ¶â¾î³»¾ú´Ù. ÁÖ»ç±â·Î
Intralipose (fat emulsion)¸¦ 1 §¢ ÃëÇÏ°í, ±âÆ÷¸¦ Á¦°ÅÇÑ
µÚ CAMÀÇ ¹Ù·Î ¾Æ·¡ ºÎºÐ¿¡ ÁÖÀÔÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̶§ Èò»ö ¹ÙÅÁ¿¡
¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Ç÷°üÀ» °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÁÖ»ç±â·Î Intralipose¸¦ ÁÖ
ÀÔÇÒ ¶§´Â Ç÷°üÀÌ ´ÙÄ¡Áö ¾Êµµ·Ï ÁÖÀÇÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °üÂûÀÌ ³¡³­
¼öÁ¤¶õÀ» Ä«¸Þ¶ó·Î ±ÙÁ¢ ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿´´Ù.
½ÇÇè°á°ú ¹× °íÂû
1. HUVEC proliferation ¾ïÁ¦ÀÛ¿ë
Ç÷°ü½Å»ýÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷°¡ Áõ½ÄµÈ ÈÄ Ä§À±¼º
¼ºÀåÀ» ÅëÇØ ¾ÏÁ¶Á÷À» ÇâÇØ Àڶ󳪰í, Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷µéÀÌ ºÐ
È­ÇÏ¿© Ç÷°üÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù. bFGF´Â »ç¶÷ Ç÷°ü³»ÇÇ ¼¼
Æ÷ÀÎ HUVECÀÇ °­·ÂÇÑ Ç÷°üÇü¼º ÃËÁøÁ¦·Î¼­ in vitro ¿Í
in vivo ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ ´Ù¾çÇÏ°Ô »ç¿ëµÇ¾îÁö°í ÀÖ´Â ¹°ÁúÀÌ´Ù.
Èæ»ïÀÇ bFGF¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­ À¯µµµÈ ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼ºÀÇ Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦È°
¼ºÀ» °üÂûÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¸ÕÀú 60-1,000 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­
HUVEC¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼Æ÷µ¶¼ºÀ» °üÂûÇÑ °á°ú ¼¼Æ÷µ¶¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸
³»Áö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹°ÀÇ bFGF¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­ À¯µµµÈ Ç÷°ü
³»ÇÇ ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀº Fig. 1.¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. Èæ»ïÃß
Ãâ¹°Àº bFGF¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­ À¯µµµÈ HUVEC ÀÇ Áõ½ÄÀ» ³óµµ ÀÇ
Á¸ÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Áï, 125 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ
HUVECÀÇ Áõ½ÄÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô 500 §¶/§¢
³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 58%, 1,000 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 67%ÀÇ Áõ½ÄÀ»
¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
86 ÓÞ ùÛ Üâ õ®ùÊüåò¼¡ª Vol. 26, No. 3, 2011
Fig. 1. Effect of Black Ginseng Radix Extract on bFGF-induced
Proliferation of HUVEC
All data were expressed as the mean¡¾the standard deviation,
and statistical significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA
followed by a Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. P values
<0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed
using the GraphPad PRISM¢ç version 4 statistical program
(GraphPad Software Inc., San DiegoCA, U.S.A.). Values represent
the mean¡¾S.D.*P<0.05
ÇÑÆí, ¼ö»ïÀ» Áõ±â·Î ÂǼ­ ÀÍÈù ÈÄ ¸»¸° È«»ï¿¡´Â ¼ö»ï¿¡
Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â Àλï»çÆ÷´ÑÀÇ ´ç ¼ººÐµéÀÌ °¡¼öºÐÇØµÇ¾î ¼ö»ï¿¡ ºñ
Çؼ­ ´Ù¼öÀÇ Àλï»çÆ÷´ÑÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Èæ
»ïÀº ¼ö»ïÀ» ±¸Áõ±¸Æ÷ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­ Á¦Á¶µÇ±â ¶§¹®¿¡ È«»ï¿¡
ºñÇؼ­ ´õ ¸¹Àº ¼öÀÇ Àλï»çÆ÷´ÑÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¼ö»ï
À̳ª È«»ï¿¡´Â ¼Ò·® Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö¸¸ Èæ»ï¿¡ ƯÀÌÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¹ÀÌ Á¸Àç
ÇÏ´Â Àλï»çÆ÷´ÑÀº Rg3 ¹× Rg5·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖÀ¸¸ç Ç×¾ÏÈ°¼ºÀ»
Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿© ´Ù¾çÇÑ È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³½´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù.24-26) µû¶ó
¼­ Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹°ÀÌ HUVEC Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾î Èæ»ïÀÇ
ÁÖ¿ä ¼ººÐÀÎ Rg3¿Í Rg5ÀÇ HUVEC Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ
°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Rg3 ¹× Rg5´Â ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÑ 60-1,000 §¶/
§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ HUVEC¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼Æ÷µ¶¼ºÀ» °üÂûÇÑ °á°ú ¼¼Æ÷µ¶
¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ½ÇÇè°á°ú¸¦ Fig. 2 ¹× 3¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³»
¾ú´Ù. Fig. 2.¿¡¼­¿Í °°ÀÌ Rg3´Â ³óµµÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀ¸·Î HUVEC Áõ
½Ä¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, 250 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ À¯ÀǼº
ÀÖ°Ô ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾î, °í³óµµÀÎ 500 §¶/§¢¿¡¼­´Â 32%,
1,000 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 62%ÀÇ Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦ È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú
´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Rg5µµ ¿ª½Ã Rg3¿Í ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î ³óµµÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀ¸·Î
HUVEC Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, 500 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­
ºÎÅÍ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾î, 500 §¶/§¢¿¡¼­´Â
21%, 1,000 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 61%ÀÇ Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦ È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸
³»¾ú´Ù (Fig. 3.).
Fig. 2. Effect of Rg3 on bFGF-induced Proliferation of HUVEC
All data were expressed as the mean¡¾the standard deviation,
and statistical significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA
followed by a Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. P values
<0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed
using the GraphPad PRISM¢ç version 4 statistical program
(GraphPad Software Inc., San DiegoCA, U.S.A.). Values represent
the mean¡¾S.D.*P<0.01, **P<0.001
Fig. 3. Effect of Rg5 on bFGF-induced Proliferation of HUVEC
All data were expressed as the mean¡¾the standard deviation,
and statistical significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA
followed by a Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. P values
<0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed
using the GraphPad PRISM¢ç version 4 statistical program
(GraphPad Software Inc., San DiegoCA, U.S.A.). Values represent
the mean¡¾S.D.*P<0.01, **P<0.001
2. HUVEC migration ¾ïÁ¦ÀÛ¿ë
Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹°ÀÇ bFGF¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­ À¯µµµÈ Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷ÀÇ À̵¿
¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀº Fig. 4.¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹°Àº bFGF¿¡ ÀÇ
Çؼ­ À¯µµµÈ HUVECÀÇ À̵¿À» ³óµµ ÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Áï, 125 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ HUVECÀÇ Áõ½ÄÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç
250 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 20%, 500 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 35%,
1,000 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 66%ÀÇ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô HUVEC À̵¿
¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¾Õ¼­ ¼³¸íÇÑ ¹Ù¿Í °°ÀÌ Èæ»ïÃß
Ãâ¹°ÀÌ HUVEC À̵¿ ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Èæ»ïÀÇ
ÁÖ¿ä ¼ººÐÀÎ Rg3¿Í Rg5ÀÇ HUVEC À̵¿ ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ
°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè°á°ú¸¦ Fig. 5. ¹× 6.¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. Fig.
5.¿¡¼­¿Í °°ÀÌ Rg3´Â ³óµµÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀ¸·Î HUVEC À̵¿ ¾ïÁ¦È°
¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, 250 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 17%ÀÇ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ
°Ô HUVECÀÇ À̵¿ ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. °í³óµµÀÎ 500 §¶
/§¢¿¡¼­´Â 39%, 1,000 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 62%ÀÇ À̵¿ ¾ïÁ¦
È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Rg5µµ ¿ª½Ã Rg3¿Í ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î ³ó
µµÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀ¸·Î HUVEC Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸¸ç, 500 §¶
/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾î, 500 §¶
/§¢¿¡¼­´Â 21%, 1,000 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­´Â 56%ÀÇ À̵¿ ¾ïÁ¦
È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
Fig. 4. Effect of Black Ginseng Radix Extract on bFGF-induced
Migration of HUVEC.
All data were expressed as the mean¡¾the standard deviation,
and statistical significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA
followed by a Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. P values
<0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed
using the GraphPad PRISM¢ç version 4 statistical program
(GraphPad Software Inc., San DiegoCA, U.S.A.). Values represent
the mean¡¾S.D.*P<0.01, **P<0.001
Èæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦È°¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸ 87
Fig. 5. Effect of Rg3 on bFGF-induced Migration of HUVEC
All data were expressed as the mean¡¾the standard deviation,
and statistical significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA
followed by a Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. P values
<0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed
using the GraphPad PRISM¢ç version 4 statistical program
(GraphPad Software Inc., San DiegoCA, U.S.A.). Values represent
the mean¡¾S.D.*P<0.01, **P<0.001
Fig. 6. Effect of Rg5 on bFGF-induced Migration of HUVEC
All data were expressed as the mean¡¾the standard deviation,
and statistical significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA
followed by a Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. P values
<0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed
using the GraphPad PRISM¢ç version 4 statistical program. Values
represent the mean¡¾S.D.*P<0.01
3. HUVEC tube formation ¾ïÁ¦ÀÛ¿ë
Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷´Â Áõ½ÄµÈ ÈÄ Ä§À±¼º ¼ºÀåÀ» ÅëÇØ ¾Ï Á¶Á÷À»
ÇâÇØ Àڶ󳪰í, Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷µéÀÌ ºÐÈ­ÇÏ¿© ÃÖÁ¾ÀûÀ¸·Î Ç÷°ü
À» Çü¼ºÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷ÀÇ ºÐÈ­µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©
¾Ë¾Æº¸´Â tube formation assay¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. Fig. 7.¿¡¼­
¿Í °°ÀÌ HUVEC ¼¼Æ÷¿¡ ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º ÀÎÀÚÀÎ bFGF¸¦ ó¸®
Çϸé tube Çü¼ºÀÌ Àß ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³À½À» È®ÀÎ ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¿©±â
¿¡ Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹°(50 §¶/§¢)À» ó¸®Çϸé HUVEC tube Çü¼ºÀÌ
ÀúÇصÊÀ» °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ Èæ»ïÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¼ººÐÀÎ Rg3¿Í Rg5ÀÇ HUVEC tube
formation ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè°á°ú¸¦ Fig.
8. ¹× 9.¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. Fig. 8.¿¡¼­¿Í °°ÀÌ Rg3´Â 30 §¶/
§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ HUVEC tube formation ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú
´Ù. Fig. 9.¿¡¼­¿Í °°ÀÌ Rg5µµ Rg3¿Í ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î 30 §¶/§¢
³óµµ¿¡¼­ HUVEC tube formation ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
(-bFGF) (+bFGF) (+bFGF+BG 50§¶/§¢)
Fig. 7. Effect of Black Ginseng Radix Extract on bFGF-induced
Tube Formation of HUVEC
(-bFGF) (+bFGF) (+bFGF+Rg3 30§¶/§¢)
Fig. 8. Effect of Rg3 on bFGF-induced Tube Formation of HUVEC
(-bFGF) (+bFGF) (+bFGF+Rg5 30§¶/§¢)
Fig. 9. Effect of Rg5 on bFGF-induced Tube Formation of HUVEC
4. in vivo ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦ÀÛ¿ë
Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹° ¹× Èæ»ïÀÇ ÁÖ ¼ººÐÀÎ Rg3¿Í Rg5°¡ HUVEC
ÀÇ Áõ½Ä¾ïÁ¦, À̵¿¾ïÁ¦ ¹× tube formation ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸
³¿À» °üÂûÇÏ¿© in vivo ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇؼ­ Èæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦
È°¼ºÀ» °üÂûÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­´Â ¼öÁ¤¶õÀÇ Chicken
Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM)ÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü Çü¼º ¿©ºÎ¸¦
¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇØ bFGF¸¦ ó¸®ÇÏ¿© Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀ» À¯µµÇÑ ÈÄ Èæ»ï
ÃßÃâ¹°, Rg3, Rg5¸¦ Åõ¿©ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
½ÇÇè°á°ú´Â Fig. 10.¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. Fig. 10A.¿¡¼­¿Í °°ÀÌ
À¯Á¤¶õ¿¡ bFGF (100 ng)¸¦ ó¸®Çϸé Ç÷°üÀÌ Àß Çü¼ºµÊÀ»
¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¿©±â¿¡ Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹°(Fig. 10B, 0.1 §¶/egg)À»
ó¸®Çϸé Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀÌ ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÑ À¯Á¤¶õ 10°³ Áß 6°³°¡
¾ïÁ¦µÇ¾ú´Ù (60%). ¶ÇÇÑ Rg3 (Fig. 10C, 0.1 §¶/egg)¸¦ ó
¸®ÇÏ¸é ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÑ À¯Á¤¶õ 10°³ Áß 7°³°¡ ¾ïÁ¦ (70%) µÇ
¾úÀ¸¸ç, Rg5 (Fig. 10D, 0.1 §¶/egg)¸¦ ó¸®ÇÏ¸é ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç
¿ëÇÑ À¯Á¤¶õ 10°³ Áß 5°³°¡ ¾ïÁ¦ µÇ¾ú´Ù (50%).
Èæ»ïÀº ÀÌ¹Ì Ç×¾ÏÈ°¼º3)À» ºñ·ÔÇÑ ¿©·¯ °¡Áö È°¼º27-30)À» ³ª
Ÿ³»¾î ¸¹Àº °ü½ÉÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Â °¡°øÀλïÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Èæ»ïÀÇ
Ç×¾ÏÈ°¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ÀÛ¿ë ¸ÞÄ«´ÏÁò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ¹Ìºñ
ÇÑ »óÅÂÀ̹ǷΠÈæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» °üÂûÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´
´Ù. ¾Õ¼­ ¼³¸íÇÑ ¹Ù¿Í °°ÀÌ ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼ºÀº ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀÇ ¼ºÀå
°ú ÀüÀÌ¿¡ ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, À̸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¿Ü±¹ÀÇ °æ
¿ì¿¡ Ç×¾ÏÁ¦ ¹× ¿©·¯ ÁúȯÀÇ Ä¡·áÁ¦·Î ÀÌ¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Ç÷°ü ½Å
»ý ¾ïÁ¦Á¦ ¿¬±¸°¡ È°¹ßÈ÷ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. 1971³â Folkman¿¡
ÀÇÇؼ­ ¿ø¹ß¼º Á¾¾çÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÒ °æ¿ì Ç÷¾× ¼Ó¿¡ Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀ» ¾ï
Á¦ÇÏ´Â ¹°ÁúÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù´Â °¡Á¤¾Æ·¡ óÀ½À¸·Î antiangiogenic
therapy°¡ ¾ÏÄ¡·á¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¼ö´ÜÀ¸·Î µîÀåÇÑ ÀÌ·¡
31), HarvardÀÇ´ëÀÇ Vallee µî¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Ç÷°ü½Å»ý À¯µµ´Ü¹éÁúÀÎ
angiogeninÀÌ »ç¶÷ÀÇ àÍäßá¬øàÀÇ ¹è¾ç¾×À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ÃÖÃÊ·Î ºÐ¸®
µÇ¾ú°í, 1994³â¿¡´Â ¿ø¹ß¼º Á¾¾çÀ» °®°í ÀÖ´Â ÁãÀÇ Ç÷û°ú ¿À
ÁÜÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ 38kDaÀÇ angiostatinÀ» ºÐ¸®Çس»¾î
angiogenesis ¾ïÁ¦È¿°ú¸¦ È®ÀÎÇßÀ¸¸ç, 1997³â¿¡´Â 20kDaÀÇ
endostatinÀ̶ó´Â ¹°ÁúÀ» ºÐ¸®Çس»¾î Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷ÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ»
¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ´Â È¿°ú¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´°í, 1998³â¿¡´Â NCI¿¡¼­ °ø½ÄÀûÀ¸
·Î angiostatin°ú endostatinÀ» µ¿½Ã¿¡ Åõ¿©ÇÏ¿© Áã¿¡ À¯¹ßµÈ
Á¾¾çÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÔÀ» ¹ßÇ¥ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á, Á¾¾çÀÇ Ç÷°ü½Å»ý¾ïÁ¦°¡
88 ÓÞ ùÛ Üâ õ®ùÊüåò¼¡ª Vol. 26, No. 3, 2011
»õ·Î¿î Á¾¾ç Ä¡·á¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ¼¼°èÀûÀÎ °ü½ÉÀ» ²ø°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù32). Çö
Àç±îÁö ¾Ë·ÁÁø angiogenesis ¾ïÁ¦Á¦´Â angiostatin,
endostatin, 2-methoxyestradiol, TNP-470 µîÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç,
ÃÖ±Ù ¹Ì±¹¿¡¼­ Avastin (Anti-VEGF mAb)ÀÌ 2004³â FDA
Çã°¡ ÃëµæÇÏ¿© ½ÃÆÇ Áß¿¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, vitaxin, EMD 121974 µî
ÀÌ ÀÓ»ó ½ÃÇè Áß¿¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ Ç÷°ü½Å»ýÀ» Á¶ÀýÇÏ´Â ¹°Áú
À» ã¾Æ³»¾î Ç×¾ÏÁ¦·Î °³¹ßÇÏ·Á´Â °¡Àå Å« ÀÌÀ¯´Â ¾Ï¼¼Æ÷¿¡
´ëÇÏ¿© Á÷Á¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾Ï¼¼Æ÷¸¦ Á×À̱⺸´Ù´Â ¾Ï¼¼Æ÷°¡
¼ºÀåÇϱâ À§Çؼ­ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ Ç÷°ü½Å»ýÀ» ¿øõÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ïÁ¦ÇÔÀ¸·Î
½á ºÎÀÛ¿ëÀÌ ¾ø´Â ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ Ç×¾ÏÁ¦¸¦ °³¹ßÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ
´Ù. ÀλïÀÇ °æ¿ì ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸¸¦
»ìÆ캸¸é, ¼ö»ï ¹× È«»ï¿¡ ¸¹ÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â Àλï»çÆ÷´Ñ Re ¹×
Rg1Àº ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º ÃËÁøÀÛ¿ëÀ» ³ªÅ¸³½´Ù°í ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù33,34).
Fig. 10. Effect of Black Ginseng Radix Extract, Rg3 and Rg5 on
bFGF-induced CAM
For CAM assay, 10 eggs were used per group. Saline (A, 10 §¡
/egg, negative control), black ginseng radix extract (B, 0.1 §¶
/egg), Rg3 (C, 0.1 §¶/egg) or Rg5 (D, 0.1 §¶/egg) containing
cover slip was respectively located on CAMs of 4-5 day chicken
embryos as described in material and methods. After 2 days, the
number of avsacular eggs were analyzed and photographed
under stereomicroscope.
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Èæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ±Ô¸íÇϱâ
À§ÇÏ¿© Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹°À» HUVEC ¿¡ ó¸®ÇÏ¿© HUVEC Áõ½Ä, ÀÌ
µ¿, tube formation ¹× in vivo ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º¿¡ ¹Ì
Ä¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» »ìÆ캻 °á°ú Rg1 ¹× ReÀÇ °á°ú¿Í´Â ¹Ý´ë·Î ³ó
µµÀÇÁ¸ÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ïÁ¦È°¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³¿À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú
´Â È«»ï¿¡ ¹Ì·® Á¸ÀçÇϸç Èæ»ï¿¡ ¸¹ÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â Àλï»çÆ÷´Ñ
Rg3°¡ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦ÀÛ¿ëÀ» ³ªÅ¸³½´Ù´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¿¬±¸°á°ú35,36)
¿Í ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î¼­ Àλ£ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â »çÆ÷´ÑÀÇ ±¸Á¶¿¡ µû¶ó
¼­ ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú°¡ ´Ù¸£´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù.
Áï, ÀλïÀÇ Áõ¼÷°úÁ¤ Áß¿¡ ÀÎ»ï »çÆ÷´ÑÀÇ OH±â¿¡ °áÇյǾî
ÀÖ´Â ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ´ç ¼ººÐµéÀÌ ¿­¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­ °¡¼öºÐÇØµÇ¾î ´Ù¸¥
±¸Á¶¸¦ Áö´Ñ ÀÎ»ï »çÆ÷´ÑÀ¸·Î º¯È­µÇ±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ¼ö»ï, È«»ï ¹×
Èæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°üÇü¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °á°ú°¡ ´Þ¶óÁø´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌ
ÇÑ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Çâ ÈÄ Èæ»ïÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ç×¾ÏÁ¦ °³¹ß ¹× Rg3,
Rg5 ÀÌ¿Ü¿¡ Èæ»ï¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â ´Ù¸¥ Àλï»çÆ÷´Ñµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å»ý
Ç÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦È°¼º ¹× ±âÀü¿¬±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ
°ÍÀ¸·Î ÆǴܵȴÙ.
°á ·Ð
±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀÎ ±¸Áõ±¸Æ÷ÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ »õ·Î¿î
°í¿Â°í¾ÐÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Èæ»ïÀ» Á¦Á¶ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Èæ»ïÀ»
Á¦Á¶ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Èæ»ïÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ Èæ»ï¿¡ ƯÀÌÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¹ÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â
Àλï»çÆ÷´Ñ Rg3, Rg5¸¦ ºÐ¸®ÇÏ¿© Ç÷°ü³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷ÀÎ HUVEC¿¡
bFGF¸¦ ó¸®ÇÏ¿© Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀ» À¯µµÇÑ ÈÄ proliferation,
migration, tube formation¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» »ìÆ캸¾ÒÀ¸¸ç,
in vivo ½ÇÇèÀ¸·Î CAM assay¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·Ð
À» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. Èæ»ïÃßÃâ¹°Àº 125 §¶/§¢ ³óµµ¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ HUVEC
Áõ½Ä ¹× À̵¿À» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 50 §¶/§¢¿¡¼­ tube
formationÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Èæ»ï¿¡ ƯÀÌÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¹ÀÌ Á¸Àç
ÇÏ´Â Àλï»çÆ÷´ÑÀÎ Rg3¿Í Rg5µµ HUVEC Áõ½Ä, À̵¿ ¹×
tube formationÀ» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÑÆí, in vivo ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ Èæ»ï
ÃßÃâ¹°, Rg3 ¹× Rg5°¡ °¢°¢ 60%, 70% ¹× 50%ÀÇ ¾ïÁ¦È°¼º
À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î º¸¾Æ Èæ»ïÀÇ Ç×¾ÏÈ°¼ºÀº ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦È°¼º
¿¡ ±âÀÎÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆǴܵȴÙ.
°¨»çÀÇ ±Û
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ³ó¸²¼ö»ê½ÄÇ°±â¼ú°³¹ß ¿¬±¸°úÁ¦(°úÁ¦¹øÈ£
110060-03-2-CG000)¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´ø ¹Ù ÀÌ¿¡ °¨»çµå
¸³´Ï´Ù.
Âü°í¹®Çå
1. Lee SI. The history of Korean ginseng 2nd.
Samhwa press. 1980£º166.
2. Keum YS, Park KK, Lee JM, Chun KS, Park JH,
Lee SK, Kwon H, Surh YJ. Antioxidant and
anti-tumor promoting activities of the methanol
extract of heat-processed ginseng. Cancer Lett.
2000;150£º41-48.
3. Lee JH, Shen GN, Kim EK, Shin HJ, Myung CS,
Oh HJ, Kim DH, Roh SS, Cho W, Seo YB, Park
YJ, Kang CW, Song GY. Preparation of black
ginseng and its antitumor activity. 2006;20(4)£º
951-956.
4. Song GY, Ph HJ, Roh SS, Seo YB, Park YJ,
Myung CS. Effect of black ginseng on body weight
and lipid profiles in male rats fed normal diets.
Yakhak Hoeji. 2006;50£º381-385.
5. Kim EK, LEE JH, Cho SH, Shen GN, Jin LG,
Myung CS, Oh HJ, Kim DH, Yun JD, Roh SS,
Park YJ, Seo YB, Song GY. Preparation of black
panax ginseng by new methods and its antitumor
activity. The Korea Journal Herbology. 2008;23(
1)£º85-92.
6. Kim Y. Deoxypodophyllotoxin; the cytotoxic and
antiangiogenic component from Pulsatilla koreana.
Èæ»ïÀÇ ½Å»ýÇ÷°ü ¾ïÁ¦È°¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸ 89
Planta Med. 2003;68(3)£º271-274.
7. Griffioen AW, Molema G. Angiogenesis£ºpotentials
for pharmacologic intervention in the treatment of
cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic
inflammation. Pharmacol. Rev. 2000;52(2)£º237-68.
8. Bergers G, Benjamin L. Tumorigenesis and the
angiogenic switch. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;3£º
401-410.
9. Folkman J. Angiogenesis and apoptosis. Semin.
Cancer Biol. 2003;3£º159-167.
10. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and
other diseases. Nature. 2000;407£º249-57.
11. Folkman J, Siegel Y. Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem.
1992;267£º10931-10934.
12. Boyd D. Invasion and metastasis. Cancer
Metastasis Rev. 2006;15(1)£º77-89.
13. Nam NH, Kim HM, Bae KH. Ahn BZ. Inhibitory
effects of Vietnamese medicinal plants on tubelike
formation of human umbilical venous cells.
Phytother.Res. 2003;17£º107-111.
14. Lee KH, Choi HR. Kim CH. Anti-angiogenic effect
of the see extract of Benincasa hipida Cogniaux.
J. Ethnophamacol. 2005;97£º509-513.
15. Song YS, Kim SH, Sa JH, Jin C, Lim CJ, Park
EH. Anti-acngiogenic, antioxidant and xanthine
oxidase inhibition activities of the mushroom
Phellinus linteus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003;88£º
113-116.
16. Kim JS, Park BY, Park EK, Lee HS, Hahm JC,
Bae KH, Kim MY. Screening of Anti-angiogenic
Activity from Plant Extracts. Korean Journal of
Pharmacognosy. 2006;37(4)£º253-257.
17. Huh JE, Baek YH, Lee JD, Choi DY, Park DS.
Screening and mechanism study of angiogenesis in
many herbs medicine. The journal of Korean
Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society. 2007;24(5)£º
23-32.
18. Plate KH, Breier G, Risau W. Molecular
mechanisms of developmental and tumor
angiogenesis. Brain Pathol. 1994;4£º207-18.
19. Ha YW, Lim SS, Ha IJ, Na YC, Seo JJ, Shin H,
Son SH, Kim YS. Preparative isolation of four
ginsenosides from Korean red ginseng
(steam-treated Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer), by
high-speed countercurrent chromatography
coupled with evaporative light scattering
detection. Journal of Chromatography, A.
2007;1151(1)£º37-44.
20. Jaffe EA, Nachman RL, Becker CG, Minick CR.
Culture of human endothelial cells derived from
umbilical veins.Identification by morphologic and
immunologic criteria. J Clin Invest. 1973;52£º
2745-2756.
21. Jost LM, Kirkwood JM, Whiteside TL. Improved
short- and long-term XTT-based colorimetric
cellular cytotoxicity assay for melanoma and other
tumor cells. J Immunol Methods. 1992;147£º
153-165.
22. Reynolds AR, Reynolds LE, Nagel TE, Lively JC,
Robinson SD, Hicklin DJ, Bodary SC,
Hodivala-Dilke KM. Elevated Flk1 (Vascular
Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2) Signaling
Mediates Enhanced Angiogenesis in ©¬3-Integrin–
Deficient Mice. Cancer Res. 2004;64£º8643-8650.
23. Grant DS, Kinsella JL, Fridman R, Auerbach R,
Piasecki BA, Yamada Y, Zain M, Kleinman HK.
Interaction of endothelial cells with a laminin A
chain peptide (SIKVAV) in vitro and induction of
angiogenic behavior in vivo. J Cell Physiol.
1992;153£º614-25.
24. Nguyen HT, Yang SY, Kim JA, Song GY, Kim
YH. Dammarane-type saponins from the black
ginseng. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society.
2010;31(11)£º3423-3426.
25. Liu L, Zhu XM, Wang QJ, Zhang DL, Fang ZM,
Wang CY, Wang Z, Sun BS, Wu H, Sung CK.
Enzymatic preparation of 20(S,R)-protopanaxadiol
by transformation of 20(S,R)-Rg3 from black
ginseng. Phytochemistry. 2010;71(13)£º1514-1520.
26. Sun BS, Gu LJ, Fang ZM, Wang CY, Wang Z,
Sung CK. Determination of 11 ginsenosides in
black ginseng developed from Panax ginseng
by high performance liquid chromatography. Food
Science and Biotechnology. 2009;18(2)£º561-564.
27. Kim HJ, Lee, JY, You BR, Kim HR, Choi JE,
Nam KY et al. Antioxidant activities of ethanol
extracts from black ginseng prepared by
steaming-drying cycles. J Korean Soc Food Sci
Nutr. 2011;40(2)£º156-162.
28. Kim AJ, Kang SJ, Lee KH, Lee MS, Ha SD, Cha
YS, Kim SY. The chemopreventive potential and
anti-inflammatory activities of Korean black
ginseng in colon26-M3.1 carcinoma cells and
macrophages. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem.
2010;53(1)£º101-105.
29. Lee MR, Yun BS, Sun BS, Liu L, Zhang, DL,
Wang CY, Wang Z, Ly SY, Mo EK, Sung CK.
Change of ginsenoside Rg3 and
acetylcholinesterase inhibition of black ginseng
manufactured by grape juice soaking. J Gineng
Res. 2009;33(4)£º349-354.
30. Lee MR, Yun BS, Liu L, Zhang DL, Wang Z,
Wang CL, Gu LJ, Wang CY, Mo EK, Sung CK.
Effect of black ginseng on memory improvement
in the amnesic mice induced by scopolamine. J
Ginseng Res. 2010;34(1)£º51-58.
90 ÓÞ ùÛ Üâ õ®ùÊüåò¼¡ª Vol. 26, No. 3, 2011
31. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis£ºtherapeutic
implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971;285£º
1182-1186.
32. Kim LS, MacDonald NJ, Gubich ER. Angiostatin
and Endostatin£ºEndogenous Inhibitors of Tumor
Growth. Cancer and metastasis reviews.
2000;19(1)£º181-190.
33. Yue PY, Wong DY, Ha WY, Fung MC, Mak NK,
Yeung HW, Leung HW, Chan K, Liu L, Fan TP,
Wong RN. Elucidation of the mechanisms
underlying the angiogenic effects of ginsenoside
Rg(1) in vivo and in vitro. Angiogenesis.
2005;8(3)£º205-16.
34. Yu LC, Chen SC, Chang WC, Huang YC, Lin KM,
Lai PH, Sung HW. Stability of angiogenic agents,
ginsenoside Rg1 and Re, isolated from Panax
ginseng£ºin vitro and in vivo studies. Int J
Pharm. 2007;328(2)£º168-76.
35. Yue PY, Wong DY, Wu PK, Leung PY, Mak NK,
Yeung HW, Liu L, Cai Z, Jiang ZH, Fan TP,
Wong RN. The angiosuppressive effects of
20(R)-ginsenoside Rg3. Biochem Pharmacol.
2006;72(4)£º437-45.
36. Chen MW, Ni L, Zhao XG, Niu XY. The inhibition
of 20(R)-ginsenoside Rg3 on the expressions of
angiogenesis factors proteins in human lung
adenocarcinoma cell line A549 and HUVEC304
cell. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2005;30(5)£º
357-60.
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ